Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-11) issued a strong statement on the Norcross indictment.
A Navy veteran and former U.S. Attorney, Sherrill was unequivocal — naming Norcross, along with Senator Menendez and Justice Alito, as powerful New Jerseyans using their positions to enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers.
See here and below for her full statement.
From Menendez to Alito to Norcross, too many powerful people from New Jersey seem to think that they are above the law and work to enrich themselves at the expense of hard-working Americans.
New Jerseyans deserve to know that their tax dollars are being spent wisely, that contracts are being awarded fairly, and that the system isn’t rigged against them.
This type of corruption undermines citizens’ faith in government and costs taxpayers money.
I’ve served in the Navy, as a federal prosecutor, and now in Congress. I always have and always will put the people I serve and my oath of office above all else.
(Visited 21 times, 23 visits today)
Click here for the full Insider Index
In a recent article published by Insider NJ, political commentator Sherrill has taken aim at powerful South Jersey Democratic leader George Norcross. Sherrill criticizes Norcross for his alleged influence over state politics and his close ties to Governor Phil Murphy.
According to Sherrill, Norcross wields too much power in New Jersey politics, using his connections and resources to push his own agenda and control key decision-making processes. This, Sherrill argues, undermines the democratic process and limits the ability of other voices to be heard.
Sherrill also points to Norcross’s relationship with Governor Murphy as problematic. The two have been known to have a close working relationship, with Norcross reportedly having significant influence over Murphy’s policy decisions. This, Sherrill argues, raises questions about the independence of the governor and whether he is truly acting in the best interests of the people of New Jersey.
Critics of Norcross have long been concerned about his influence in state politics. As the head of one of the most powerful political machines in the state, Norcross has been able to shape policy and control key appointments in government. This has led to accusations of cronyism and backroom deals that benefit Norcross and his allies at the expense of the public.
In response to Sherrill’s criticisms, supporters of Norcross have defended his record, pointing to his long history of public service and his efforts to improve the lives of New Jersey residents. They argue that Norcross’s influence is a necessary part of the political process and that his connections are essential for getting things done in a state as complex as New Jersey.
The debate over George Norcross’s influence in New Jersey politics is likely to continue for some time. As more voices speak out against his power and influence, it will be interesting to see how Norcross and his allies respond. In the meantime, it is clear that the issue of political influence and power dynamics in New Jersey will remain a hot topic for discussion among political commentators and citizens alike.
