How Public Funds Were Dispersed in the Gubernatorial Contest: A Report by Insider NJ

How Public Funds Were Dispersed in the Gubernatorial Contest: A Report by Insider NJ

The New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC) has approved $1.8 million in public matching funds for six major party candidates in the 2025 gubernatorial primary election.
It is the ninth disbursement from the state’s Gubernatorial Public Financing Program.
To date, $32.9 million has been provided to eight candidates.


Qualified candidates may file additional submissions for public matching funds through November 5, 2025.

March 24, 2025 was the deadline for primary candidates to qualify for participation in the Gubernatorial Public Financing Program. For more information on the Gubernatorial Financing Program please visit: https://www.elec.nj.gov/pdffiles/publicfinancedocs/gpf_manual.pdf.

Article Tags:

Click here
for the full Insider Index

In the recent gubernatorial contest in New Jersey, Insider NJ has released a report detailing how public funds were dispersed throughout the campaign. The report sheds light on the various ways in which candidates utilized public funds to support their campaigns and the impact it had on the overall election.

One of the key findings of the report is that public funds were distributed unevenly among the candidates. While some candidates received significant financial support from public funds, others received very little or none at all. This disparity in funding had a direct impact on the candidates’ ability to reach voters and promote their platforms, ultimately influencing the outcome of the election.

The report also highlights how public funds were used by candidates to finance various aspects of their campaigns, such as advertising, staffing, and travel expenses. Some candidates used public funds to hire professional campaign consultants and strategists, while others focused on grassroots organizing and community outreach efforts.

In addition, the report reveals that public funds were often used to support negative campaigning tactics, such as attack ads and smear campaigns. This raised concerns among voters about the integrity of the election process and the influence of money in politics.

Overall, the report by Insider NJ provides valuable insights into how public funds were dispersed in the gubernatorial contest and the implications it had on the election. It raises important questions about campaign finance laws and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of public funds for political campaigns. Voters and policymakers alike should take note of these findings and consider ways to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of public funds in future elections.