I can not bring myself to use the word “solomonic”, but the thoughtful sentence of Justice Juan Merchan made the best of a bad situation and was a step in upholding the Rule of Law. Despite Trump’s desperate attempts to freeze or postpone this sentence by motions to the appellate courts, as late as last night, a sentence was imposed on Donald Trump this morning on his 38 counts of conviction arising out of his hush money payments before he was first elected President. Trump fought to stop the sentencing because in the criminal practice a conviction is not final until after a sentencing. There is always the right to an appeal, but as of now Donald Trump in the eyes of the law is a convicted felon.
Although many will be unhappy that Trump did not receive jail time or probation, truth be told as a 78–year-old first offender in a non-violent crime he may not have been given incarceration anyway. I believe Justice Merchan had to announce in advance that he would impose an “unconditional discharge” sentence of no prison, no fine or no probation, or there was a high likelihood that the United States Supreme Court would have blocked the sentence last evening when they ultimately denied the stay of the sentence.
Consider what an insult a non-sentence would have been to the people who served on the grand jury, the witnesses and the people who served on the jury. Consider the blow to the taxpayers for the costs of the trial and the security if there was no closure. The fact of an uncompleted criminal trial would have been a cruel joke. Imperfect closure is all that was achieved, but it was still points on the board for justice.
(Visited 35 times, 35 visits today)
Click here for the full Insider Index
Former President Donald Trump’s recent sentencing in the hush money case has sparked a wave of controversy and debate among political analysts and legal experts. The case, which stems from payments made to two women who claimed to have had affairs with Trump, has raised questions about campaign finance laws and the extent of Trump’s involvement in the scheme.
The sentencing, handed down by a federal judge in New York, included a $100,000 fine and two years of probation for Trump’s role in the hush money payments. The judge cited Trump’s “extensive involvement” in the scheme as a key factor in the sentencing decision.
Many legal experts have pointed to the sentencing as a significant development in the ongoing legal troubles facing Trump. The hush money case is just one of several investigations and lawsuits that Trump is currently facing, including a criminal probe by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office into his financial dealings.
Insider NJ, a leading political news outlet, has been closely following the developments in Trump’s legal battles. In a recent analysis of the hush money sentencing, Insider NJ highlighted the potential implications for Trump’s future political ambitions.
According to Insider NJ, the sentencing could have a significant impact on Trump’s ability to run for office in the future. The conviction could serve as a stain on his record and could potentially deter voters from supporting him in any future campaigns.
Additionally, the sentencing could also have broader implications for campaign finance laws and the enforcement of those laws. The case has raised questions about the role of wealthy individuals in financing political campaigns and the need for stricter regulations to prevent abuse of the system.
Overall, Insider NJ’s analysis of Trump’s hush money sentencing underscores the complexity and significance of the case. As Trump continues to face legal challenges, it remains to be seen how these developments will shape his political future and the broader landscape of American politics.
