An Appellate Court on Tuesday will hear oral arguments in Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh’s suit to prevent the state Attorney General Matt Platkin from taking over Silk City’s Police Department.
NorthJersey.com reports that the League of Municipalities has joined the mayor’s cause to prevent the state takeover.
Engelbert Ribeiro, the Saygegh appointee ousted as police chief as part of the AG’s organizational plan for the department, and Mark Bulur, confidential assistant to the public safety director, are party to the mayor’s suit.
Pictured above: Paterson Mayor Sayegh.
Below: State Attorney General Matt Platkin.
The League says the AG lacks the basis to take control of the PD.
For more, please go here.
In addition, please see this:
Since the New Jersey attorney general took control of the police department 16 months ago, Paterson PD has held community listening sessions to address residents’ concerns. Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh joins PIX11 to discuss an ongoing lawsuit to end the takeover, relief from extreme heat, and new crimefighting tools being launched by the police department.
(Visited 67 times, 67 visits today)
The AG Takeover Case of the Paterson Police Department has been a hot topic of discussion in New Jersey recently, with oral arguments set to take place on Tuesday. The case, which involves the state Attorney General’s office seeking to take control of the troubled police department, has been met with both support and opposition from various parties.
The Paterson Police Department has been under scrutiny for a number of issues, including allegations of misconduct, corruption, and excessive use of force. In response to these concerns, the state Attorney General’s office filed a lawsuit seeking to place the department under its control in order to implement reforms and improve accountability.
According to Insider NJ, oral arguments in the case are set to take place on Tuesday, where both sides will have the opportunity to present their arguments before a judge. The outcome of these arguments could have far-reaching implications for the future of the Paterson Police Department and law enforcement in New Jersey as a whole.
Supporters of the AG takeover argue that it is necessary in order to address the systemic issues within the department and ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions. They believe that the state Attorney General’s office has the resources and expertise to implement much-needed reforms and restore public trust in the police force.
On the other hand, opponents of the takeover argue that it is an overreach of state authority and could set a dangerous precedent for other police departments in New Jersey. They believe that local control is essential for effective policing and that the state should work collaboratively with the city of Paterson to address any issues within the department.
As the oral arguments approach, all eyes will be on the courtroom as both sides make their case for or against the AG takeover of the Paterson Police Department. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the future of law enforcement in New Jersey and could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.
